|
|
Post by 94m6hardtopz on Feb 17, 2006 3:23:08 GMT -5
a guy i know made 415rwhp with his 383 inch lt1. so everyone i know is deep throating him. the car is an m6 car and went 12.30s@112. wow. the car is not only 20 rwhp down from where the technology was in 1997, but its also trapping 11mph less then it should. i wanted to congratulate him on having the most unimpressive 12:1 383 ive ever seen. some people amaze me.  |
|
|
|
Post by ssnorm96 on Feb 17, 2006 8:53:52 GMT -5
Have you raced him??? Did you win??? Then you don't have to tell him  |
|
|
|
Post by AAron on Feb 17, 2006 11:49:25 GMT -5
well on another site there is a lot of that going on.
i stop going to that site
|
|
|
|
Post by 94m6hardtopz on Feb 17, 2006 14:19:00 GMT -5
Have you raced him??? Did you win??? Then you don't have to tell him its pretty pathetic that my stock motor with a 150 shot would outrun him. |
|
|
|
Post by 93yellowfbody on Feb 17, 2006 15:47:55 GMT -5
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by radcat on Feb 17, 2006 21:54:56 GMT -5
Nothing wrong with being a dyno queen. I was with my v6 Now that I have the v8 though I want to backup the #s at the track. I haven't even dynoed the car yet though. |
|
|
|
Post by ssnorm96 on Feb 17, 2006 23:45:18 GMT -5
Nothing wrong with being a dyno queen. I was with my v6 I'm sorry, you were a what with a V6??? Dare I ask what kind of numbers you put down???  |
|
|
|
Post by momacoz on Feb 18, 2006 21:08:14 GMT -5
hell, mark is running 11.6 @ 118 in the 1/4. and its a LS1,
M6 with only a 100 shot on her.
|
|
|
|
Post by lt1sierra on Feb 20, 2006 13:03:29 GMT -5
Nothing wrong with being a dyno queen. I was with my v6 I'm sorry, you were a what with a V6??? Dare I ask what kind of numbers you put down??? Might want to know a little about the car before you roll the eyes.... It was a turbo V6 and it was putting around ~350ish at the wheels. Don't remember the torque though. Once radcat sees this, he can tell you for sure. I don't remember the exact numbers. |
|
|
|
Post by radcat on Feb 20, 2006 16:09:43 GMT -5
Nothing wrong with being a dyno queen. I was with my v6 I'm sorry, you were a what with a V6??? Dare I ask what kind of numbers you put down??? Nothing to brag about when comparing it to a v8. It sure held it's own vs ls1s on the highway though. At the time it was the most hp and tq of any DD 3.8l v6 with stock tuning and stock internals that I have ever heard of. It put down 349hp and 415tq. Didn't even get a full pull because it maxed out the maf at ~4400 rpms. Only guy higher than me that I know of had the same setup but had tuning and a 50 shot. I think he made around 380hp and 440tq. |
|
|
|
Post by AAron on Feb 20, 2006 17:46:57 GMT -5
that is still crazy for a v6
|
|
|
|
Post by ssnorm96 on Feb 20, 2006 19:11:06 GMT -5
That's pretty cool...I almost traded my Impala for a GN. Didn't work out though.
|
|
|
|
Post by turtle on Feb 20, 2006 22:14:01 GMT -5
I'm sorry, you were a what with a V6??? Dare I ask what kind of numbers you put down??? Nothing to brag about when comparing it to a v8. It sure held it's own vs ls1s on the highway though. At the time it was the most hp and tq of any DD 3.8l v6 with stock tuning and stock internals that I have ever heard of. It put down 349hp and 415tq. Didn't even get a full pull because it maxed out the maf at ~4400 rpms. Only guy higher than me that I know of had the same setup but had tuning and a 50 shot. I think he made around 380hp and 440tq. WOW, that is impressive . Nice #"s  |
|
|
|
Post by radcat on Feb 20, 2006 23:03:16 GMT -5
WOW, that is impressive . Nice #"s Some people just don't get it when I say I hope the v8 is as fast as the v6 was  |
|
|
|
Post by turtle on Feb 21, 2006 0:26:55 GMT -5
WOW, that is impressive . Nice #"s Some people just don't get it when I say I hope the v8 is as fast as the v6 was With those #'s I can totally understand |
|
